|
It is currently Mon Feb 06, 2012 2:34 am
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
| Welcome |
|
Welcome to RHAPSODY4YOU
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload and download content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, register to join our community today. |
 |
|
 |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
bitblit
|
Post subject: Create then reverse engineer a library Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:34 pm |
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 10:51 pm Posts: 138
|
|
I have a utility model that I created to be used by other models. However, the compiler options and framework in the other models are different, causing my utility to break. So, I decided to compile the utility as a library that I can distribute. I did this by selecting Library in the Component Type dialog, and compiling my model. Then I created a .h header file for it, and reverse engineered that back into a test model. I may be using it wrong, but I figured reverse engineering it allows the tool to have insight into the public interfaces of my library, without having to distribute the actual model. My test model compiles and executes, but I get unusual behavior that I can't explain. Does somebody have an example they can upload that demonstrates doing this?
I'm not sure if the failure is due to something I'm doing wrong with Rhapsody, or a library used within my library. I get an "Access violation reading location 0x00000000" error. I don't see any null pointers, though I don't really know whats going on within the library. The actual failure occurs on a function call into a library that my library linked in.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|